Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.249
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263437, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35108332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was great enthusiasm for the use of azithromycin with or without hydroxychloroquine. OBJECTIVES: We analyzed azithromycin consumption in Croatia in 2020 and compared this to the period 2017-2019. METHODS: Azithromycin consumption was evaluated using the IQVIA Adriatic d.o.o. database which collects data on azithromycin distribution from wholesale pharmacies to hospital and non-hospital pharmacies in Croatia. We analyzed data for the period from January 2017 to December 2020. Azithromycin distribution was measured as days of therapy (DOT) and reported as per 1000 inhabitants or per 1000 inhabitant-days. RESULTS: In the period 2017-2020, total azithromycin DOT in Croatia increased in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 (1.76, 1.91, 1.91 and 2.01/1000 inhabitant-days, respectively). Non-hospital pharmacies received 2.18 times and hospital pharmacies 4.39 times more DOT units/1000 inhabitants of azithromycin in March 2020 compared to the average distribution rate in March 2017-2019. During the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic (November and December 2020) azithromycin distribution increased considerably in hospital (3.62 and 3.19 times, respectively) and non-hospital pharmacies (1.93 and 1.84 times, respectively) compared to the average consumption in the same months in 2017-2019. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed increased azithromycin distribution in the period 2017-2020 which indicates azithromycin overuse. Preliminary information on COVID-19 treatments with a desire to offer and try what is available even in the absence of strong scientific evidence may have influenced practices of antimicrobial prescriptions.


Assuntos
Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Antibacterianos , Anti-Infecciosos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Croácia/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Pandemias , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
2.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 130(1): 122-131, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34709724

RESUMO

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are used in asthma management but can cause serious adverse effects. We aimed to investigate the usage trends in a nationwide asthma cohort in Denmark from 1999 to 2018. Using national registers, we identified young adults (18-45 years) with two or more asthma drug collections within 12 months since the age of 15 years as indicative of active asthma. OCS exposure level was stratified as high use (≥5 mg prednisolone/day/year) and low use (<5 mg/day/year). Lorenz curves were computed to illustrate potential skewness of consumption among the OCS users. We identified 318 950 individuals with a median age of 29 years (IQR 20-38 years) whereof 57% were women. The 1-year prevalence of OCS users was stable at 4.8% (median, IQR 4.7%-4.8%), but with nearly 40% decrease in high-users from 0.54% in 1999 to 0.33% in 2018. The median annual exposure decreased from 500 mg/year (1999) to 250 mg/year (2018). We found a substantial skewness in the distribution of OCS usage with 10% of users accounting for almost 50% of all OCS use. The prevalence of OCS users among young adults with active asthma has been relatively stable from 1999 to 2018, but with a decreasing prevalence of high-users and annual consumption.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Prednisolona/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(3): 998-1007, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34606956

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Opioid use is common among patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), given that pain is a defining symptom. Unfortunately, long-term opioid use places patients at dramatically increased risk of overdose and death. Although surgical revascularization is extremely effective in alleviating ischemic pain related to PAD, it is unclear whether this practice results in the discontinuation of opioids after surgery. Therefore, we conducted the following study to investigate trends in opioid use before and after surgical bypass in patients with PAD, as well as the risk factors for continued opioid use after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing open lower extremity bypass for claudication or rest pain between June 1, 2017, and March 31, 2021. Patients were grouped according to whether they reported preoperative opioid use at the time of surgery. The primary outcome was continued opioid use at 30-day follow-up after discharge. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to estimate the association of continued opioid use with patient characteristics, preoperative opioid use, and receiving a postoperative opioid prescription. RESULTS: Among 3873 patients undergoing surgery, the mean age was 65.7 (10.2) years and 2650 (68.4%) patients were male. There were 913 patients (23.6%) who used opioids preoperatively and hydrocodone was the most common preoperative opioid (583 [63.9%]). At discharge, 2506 patients (64.7%) received a postoperative opioid prescription. Postoperative opioid prescriptions were significantly more common for preoperative opioid users than opioid-naïve patients (813 [89.0%] vs 1693 [57.2%]; P < .001) and were significantly larger in size (24.3 [21.1] pills vs 19.9 [10.5] pills; P < .001). On 30-day follow-up, 522 preoperative opioid users (61.3%) and 616 opioid-naïve patients (28.4%) reported that they were still using opioids (P < .001). Continued opioid use at follow-up was associated with preoperative opioid use (adjusted odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.70-3.89) and receiving a postoperative opioid prescription (adjusted odds ratio, 10.83; 95% confidence interval, 7.96-15.06). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with PAD who use opioids preoperatively do not discontinue opioids after lower extremity bypass. Moreover, a significant proportion of previously opioid-naïve patients are still using opioids 1 month after surgery. In both cases, postoperative opioid prescriptions had the strongest association with continued opioid use. These findings underscore the need for improved prescribing practice and increased attentiveness to discontinuation of unnecessary medications after surgery.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Claudicação Intermitente/terapia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Enxerto Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Enxerto Vascular/efeitos adversos
4.
J Pediatr ; 240: 66-71.e4, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481808

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide up-to-date medication prescribing patterns in US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to examine trends in prescribing patterns over time. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cohort study of 799 016 infants treated in NICUs managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group from 2010 to 2018. We used 3 different methods to report counts of medication: exposure, courses, and days of use. We defined the change in frequency of medication administration by absolute change and relative change. We examined the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) package insert for each medication to determine whether a medication was labeled for use in infants and used PubMed to search for pharmacokinetics (PK) studies. RESULTS: The most frequently prescribed medications included ampicillin, gentamicin, caffeine citrate, poractant alfa, morphine, vancomycin, furosemide, fentanyl, midazolam, and acetaminophen. Of the top 50 medications used in infants with extremely low birth weight, only 20 (40%) are FDA-labeled for use in infants; of the 30 that are not labeled for use in infants, 13 (43%) had at least 2 published PK studies. The medications with the greatest relative increase in use from 2010 to 2018 included dexmedetomidine, clonidine, rocuronium, levetiracetam, atropine, and diazoxide. The medications with the greatest relative decrease in use included tromethamine acetate, pancuronium, chloral hydrate, imipenem + cilastatin, and amikacin. CONCLUSION: Trends of medication use in the NICU change substantially over time. It is imperative to identify changes in medication use in the NICU to better inform further prospective studies.


Assuntos
Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Estados Unidos
5.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 505, 2021 10 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Relatively high rates of adherence to myocardial infarction (MI) secondary prevention medications have been reported, but register-based, objective real-world data is scarce. We aimed to analyse adherence to guideline-recommended medications for secondary prevention of MI in 2017 to 2018 (period II) and compare the results with data from 2004 to 2005 (period I) in Estonia. METHODS: Study populations were formed based on data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund's database and on Estonian Myocardial Infarction Register. By linking to the Estonian Medical Prescription Centre database adherence to guideline-recommended medications for MI secondary prevention was assessed for 1 year follow-up period from the first hospitalization due to MI. Data was analysed using the defined daily dosages methodology. RESULTS: Total of 6694 and 6060 cases of MI were reported in periods I and II, respectively. At least one prescription during the follow up period was found for beta-blockers in 81.0% and 83.5% (p = 0.001), for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) in 76.9% and 66.0% (p < 0.001), and for statins in 44.0% and 67.0% (p < 0.001) of patients in period I and II, respectively. P2Y12 inhibitors were used by 76.4% of patients in period II. The logistic regression analysis adjusted to gender and age revealed that some drugs and drug combinations were not allocated similarly in different age and gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: In Estonia, adherence to MI secondary prevention guideline-recommended medications has improved. But as adherence is still not ideal more attention should be drawn to MI secondary prevention through systematic guideline implementation.


Assuntos
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Prevenção Secundária/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Estônia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 493, 2021 10 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34645389

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) emerged as an alternative with comparable or superior efficacy and safety to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to investigate the patterns, predictors, timelines and temporal trends of shifting from VKAs to NOACs. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, the computerized database of a large healthcare provider in Israel, Maccabi Healthcare Services, was searched to identify patients with AF for whom either a VKA or NOAC was prescribed between 2012 and 2015. Time from diagnosis to therapy initiation and to shifting between therapies was evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 6987 eligible AF incident patients, 2338 (33.4%) initiated treatment with a VKA and 2221 (31.7%) with a NOAC. In addition, 5259 prevalent patients were analyzed. During the study period, NOAC prescriptions proportion among the newly diagnosed cases increased from 32 to 68.4% (p for trend <  0.001). The median time from diagnosis to first dispensing was greater in NOAC than VKA and decreased among patients treated with NOAC during the study period (2012: 1.9 and 0.3 months, 2015: 0.7 and 0.2 months, respectively). During follow-up, 3737 (49%) patients (54.3% and 47.1% of the incident and prevalent cases, respectively), shifted from a VKA to a NOAC, after a median of 22 months and 39 months in the incident and prevalent cases, respectively, decreasing throughout the study period. Female gender, younger age, southern district, higher CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASC score, non-smoking, and treatment with antiplatelets were associated with a greater likelihood for therapy shift. Shifting from a NOAC to a VKA decreased over time from 8 to 4.5% in 2012 to 0.5% and 0.7% in 2015 in the incident and prevalent groups, p <  0.001 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Shifting from VKA to NOAC occurred in 50% of the cases, more frequently among incident cases, and younger patients with greater stroke risk. Shifting from a NOAC to a VKA was much less frequent, yet it occurred more often in incident cases and decreased over time. A socially and economically sensitive program to optimize the initiation of OAC therapy upon diagnosis is warranted.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Substituição de Medicamentos/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inibidores , Administração Oral , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Circ Heart Fail ; 14(10): e008573, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587763

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An unprecedented shift to remote heart failure outpatient care occurred during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given challenges inherent to remote care, we studied whether remote visits (video or telephone) were associated with different patient usage, clinician practice patterns, and outcomes. METHODS: We included all ambulatory cardiology visits for heart failure at a multisite health system from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID) or April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (COVID era), resulting in 10 591 pre-COVID in-person, 7775 COVID-era in-person, 1009 COVID-era video, and 2322 COVID-era telephone visits. We used multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions with propensity weighting and patient clustering to study ordering practices and outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with in-person visits, video visits were used more often by younger (mean 64.7 years [SD 14.5] versus 74.2 [14.1]), male (68.3% versus 61.4%), and privately insured (45.9% versus 28.9%) individuals (P<0.05 for all). Remote visits were more frequently used by non-White patients (35.8% video, 37.0% telephone versus 33.2% in-person). During remote visits, clinicians were less likely to order diagnostic testing (odds ratio, 0.20 [0.18-0.22] video versus in-person, 0.18 [0.17-0.19] telephone versus in-person) or prescribe ß-blockers (0.82 [0.68-0.99], 0.35 [0.26-0.47]), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0.69 [0.50-0.96], 0.48 [0.35-0.66]), or loop diuretics (0.67 [0.53-0.85], 0.45 [0.37-0.55]). During telephone visits, clinicians were less likely to prescribe ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers)/ARNIs (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; 0.54 [0.40-0.72]). Telephone visits but not video visits were associated with higher rates of 90-day mortality (1.82 [1.14-2.90]) and nonsignificant trends towards higher rates of 90-day heart failure emergency department visits (1.34 [0.97-1.86]) and hospitalizations (1.36 [0.98-1.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Remote visits for heart failure care were associated with reduced diagnostic testing and guideline-directed medical therapy prescription. Telephone but not video visits were associated with increased 90-day mortality.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cardiologistas/tendências , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Telemedicina/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos/tendências , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Telefone/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Comunicação por Videoconferência/tendências
8.
Pediatrics ; 148(4)2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34548379

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Antivirals are recommended for children hospitalized with influenza but are underutilized. We describe antiviral prescribing during influenza admissions in Canadian pediatric centers and identify factors associated with antiviral use. METHODS: We performed active surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations among children ≤16 years old at the 12 Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active hospitals, from 2010-2011 to 2018-2019. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with antiviral use. RESULTS: Among 7545 patients, 57.4% were male; median age was 3 years (interquartile range: 1.1-6.3). Overall, 41.3% received antiviral agents; 72.8% received antibiotics. Antiviral use varied across sites (range, 10.2% to 81.1%) and influenza season (range, 19.9% to 59.6%) and was more frequent in children with ≥1 chronic health condition (52.7% vs 36.7%; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with antiviral use included older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.05]), more recent season (highest aOR 9.18 [95% CI, 6.70-12.57] for 2018-2019), admission during peak influenza period (aOR 1.37 [95% CI, 1.19-1.58]), availability of local treatment guideline (aOR 1.54 [95% CI, 1.17-2.02]), timing of laboratory confirmation (highest aOR 2.67 [95% CI, 1.97-3.61] for result available before admission), presence of chronic health conditions (highest aOR 4.81 [95% CI, 3.61-6.40] for cancer), radiographically confirmed pneumonia (aOR 1.39 [95% CI, 1.20-1.60]), antibiotic treatment (aOR 1.51 [95% CI, 1.30-1.76]), respiratory support (1.57 [95% CI, 1.19-2.08]), and ICU admission (aOR 3.62 [95% CI, 2.88-4.56]). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza antiviral agents were underused in Canadian pediatric hospitals, including among children with high-risk chronic health conditions. Prescribing varied considerably across sites, increased over time, and was associated with patient and hospital-level characteristics. Multifaceted hospital-based interventions are warranted to strengthen adherence to influenza treatment guidelines and antimicrobial stewardship practices.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Canadá , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Influenza Humana/complicações , Masculino , Análise Multivariada
9.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(32): 3583-3590, 2021 11 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34357780

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite the widespread use of the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel for a variety of cancers and their well-known association with hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), there is still significant variation in the prescribing practices of steroids for premedication. Premedication almost always includes dexamethasone, which can be associated with multiple adverse effects if taken for extended periods of time. This study reviews the pattern of steroid premedication in patients who received paclitaxel or docetaxel at Stanford Cancer Institute between January 2010 and June 2020. METHODS: We used an electronic query of the electronic medical record followed up with a manual review of patient charts to ask whether we could find a correlation between steroid premedication dosing and the incidence or severity of HSRs with the first taxane dose. Variables considered included steroid dose and route, dose and type of taxane, clinical cancer group, sex, and race. RESULTS: Five thousand two hundred seventeen patients were identified as having received paclitaxel or docetaxel, and 3,181 met criteria for our analysis. There were 264 (8.3%) HSRs. In adjusted multivariate analysis, we found no correlation of HSR rate or severity among any of the variables evaluated except gynecology oncology clinic patients, who had an increased risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34) of HSRs overall and high-grade HSRs (HR 2.34), and female patients, who had a higher rate of HSRs overall (HR 1.26), but not high-grade HSRs. CONCLUSION: Neither dexamethasone dose nor route correlated with subsequent HSRs. Given the potential for adverse events from repeated high-dose steroids, our findings suggest that routine use of lower doses, such as a single 10 mg dose of dexamethasone, as premedication for taxanes to prevent HSRs is preferable to the current prescribing guidelines.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Docetaxel/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Pré-Medicação , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , California , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 31(9): 2661-2668, 2021 08 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34218990

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate diabetes treatment initiation and continuation in the next sixth months in newly diagnosed Italian subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed administrative claims of 11,300,750 Italian residents. Subjects with incident diabetes were identified by glucose lowering drug prescriptions, disease-specific co-payment exemptions and hospital discharge codes occurring in 2018 but not in 2017. Incident cases were 65,932 of whom 91.4% received the prescription of a glucose lowering drug. Among the latter, those receiving a prescription of a noninsulin medication but no insulin were 84.8%, those receiving a prescription of insulin only were 9.4%, and those receiving prescriptions of both insulin and noninsulin drugs were 5.8%. Metformin was the most frequently drug initially prescribed in noninsulin treated subjects (~85%) and sulphonylurea receptor (SUR) agonists collectively ranked as second (~13%). Lispro (35%) and glargine (34%) were the most frequently prescribed molecules in subjects who were insulin treated. Differences in prescriptions were found in age categories, with increased use of SUR agonists across decades. In the first six months, as many as 50% of noninsulin treated patients continued with the initial drug, ~15% added a second agent, ~5% switched to another medication, and ~30% discontinued any glucose lowering treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data document that current guidelines are often neglected because prescriptions of SUR agonists as first agent are still quite common and insulin is prescribed more than expected. They point out the urgent need to improve the dissemination and implementations of guidelines in diabetes care.


Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Glicemia/metabolismo , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Substituição de Medicamentos/tendências , Quimioterapia Combinada/tendências , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
11.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 324, 2021 07 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34215190

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been revolutionized by angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). ARNI has been shown to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in a large, randomized controlled trial. However, real-world evaluation of ARNI with a diverse population is still limited. METHODS: HFrEF patients receiving angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) or standard HF treatment at a university hospital in Thailand were prospectively followed-up from January 2015 to December 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 12 months, the primary outcome occurred in 10 patients in the ARNI group (11.5%) and 28 in the standard treatment group (28.0%) (hazard ratio 0.34; 95% CI: 0.15-0.80; p = 0.013). After adjustment for confounding factors, ARNI was significantly associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome (HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13-0.82, p = 0.017). In addition, ARNI was also significantly associated with a decrease in the clinical signs and symptoms of HF, including dyspnea, orthopnea, and fatigue. Orthostatic hypotension was more frequently reported among the ARNI group than among the standard treatment group. The rates of target dose achievement were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In real-world practice, ARNI use was associated with a significant reduction in both clinical outcomes and symptom improvement, while orthostatic hypotension was more common in patients in the ARNI group than in patients in the standard treatment group.


Assuntos
Aminobutiratos/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Bifenilo/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Neprilisina/antagonistas & inibidores , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêutico , Valsartana/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Aminobutiratos/efeitos adversos , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Bifenilo/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Inibidores de Proteases/efeitos adversos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Valsartana/efeitos adversos
12.
Pediatrics ; 148(2)2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34230092

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no effective interventions to prevent hospital admissions in infants with bronchiolitis. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against routine bronchodilator use for bronchiolitis. The objective of this study was to characterize trends in and outcomes associated with the use of bronchodilators for bronchiolitis. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of infants <12 months of age with bronchiolitis from 49 children's hospitals from 2010 to 2018. The primary outcomes were rates of hospital admissions, ICU admissions, emergency department (ED) return visits after initial ED discharge, noninvasive ventilation, and invasive ventilation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the rates of outcomes among hospitals with high and low early use of bronchodilators (on day of presentation). RESULTS: A total of 446 696 ED visits of infants with bronchiolitis were included. Bronchodilator use, hospital admissions, and ED return visits decreased between 2010 and 2018 (all P < .001). ICU admissions and invasive and noninvasive ventilation increased over the study period (all P < .001). Hospital-level early bronchodilator use (hospitals with high versus low use) was not associated with differences in patient-level hospital admissions, ICU admissions, ED return visits, noninvasive ventilation, or invasive ventilation (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In a large study of infants at children's hospitals, bronchodilator therapy decreased significantly from 2010 to 2018. Hospital-level early bronchodilator use was not associated with a reduction in any outcomes. This study supports the current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation to limit routine use of bronchodilators in infants with bronchiolitis.


Assuntos
Bronquiolite/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Bronquiolite/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(26): 2948-2958, 2021 09 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292766

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Heightened regulations have decreased opioid prescribing across the United States, yet little is known about trends in opioid access among patients dying of cancer. METHODS: Among 270,632 Medicare fee-for-service decedents with poor prognosis cancers, we used part D data to examine trends from 2007 to 2017 in opioid prescription fills and opioid potency (morphine milligram equivalents per day [MMED]) near the end-of-life (EOL), defined as the 30 days before death or hospice enrollment. We used administrative claims to evaluate trends in pain-related emergency department (ED) visits near EOL. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2017, the proportion of decedents with poor prognosis cancers receiving ≥ 1 opioid prescription near EOL declined 15.5% (relative percent difference [RPD]), from 42.0% (95% CI, 41.4 to 42.7) to 35.5% (95% CI, 34.9 to 36.0) and the proportion receiving ≥ 1 long-acting opioid prescription declined 36.5% (RPD), from 18.1% (95% CI, 17.6 to 18.6) to 11.5% (95% CI, 11.1 to 11.9). Among decedents receiving opioids near EOL, the mean daily dose fell 24.5%, from 85.6 MMED (95% CI, 82.9 to 88.3) to 64.6 (95% CI, 62.7 to 66.6) MMED. Overall, the total amount of opioids prescribed per decedent near EOL (averaged across those who did and did not receive an opioid) fell 38.0%, from 1,075 morphine milligram equivalents per decedent (95% CI, 1,042 to 1,109) to 666 morphine milligram equivalents per decedent (95% CI, 646 to 686). Simultaneously, the proportion of patients with pain-related ED visits increased 50.8% (RPD), from 13.2% (95% CI, 12.7 to 13.6) to 19.9% (95% CI, 19.4 to 20.4). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar declines in opioid utilization in the 60 and 90 days before death or hospice, and suggested that trends in opioid access were not confounded by secular trends in hospice utilization. CONCLUSION: Opioid use among patients dying of cancer has declined substantially from 2007 to 2017. Rising pain-related ED visits suggests that EOL cancer pain management may be worsening.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Manejo da Dor/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Assistência Terminal/tendências , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Dor do Câncer/diagnóstico , Dor do Câncer/epidemiologia , Morte , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/tendências , Masculino , Medicare , Manejo da Dor/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 20(1): 130, 2021 06 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183018

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are licenced for initiation for glucose lowering in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2). However, recent trial data have shown that these medications have renal and cardio-protective effects, even for impaired kidney function. The extent to which trial evidence and updated guidelines have influenced real-world prescribing of SGLT-2is is not known, particularly with co-administration of diuretics. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of people with T2DM registered with practices in the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) database on the 31st July 2019. We calculated the percentage of people prescribed SGLT-2is according to eGFR categories (< 45, 45-59, and ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2), with a heart failure diagnosis and stratified by body mass index categories (underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese), and with concomitant prescription of a diuretic. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether heart failure diagnosis and renal function were associated with SGLT-2i prescribing. RESULTS: From a population of 242,624 people with T2DM across 419 practices, 11.0% (n = 26,700) had been prescribed SGLT-2is. The majority of people initiated SGLT-2is had an eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (93.2%), and 4.3% had a heart failure diagnosis. 9,226 (3.8%) people were prescribed SGLT-2is as an add-on to their diuretic prescription. People in the highest eGFR category (≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2) were more likely to be prescribed SGLT-2is than those in eGFR lower categories. Overweight (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.841-2.274) and obese people (OR 3.84, 95% CI 3.472-4.250) were also more likely to be prescribed these medications, whilst use of diuretics (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.682-0.804) and heart failure (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.653-0.998) were associated with lower odds of being prescribed SGLT-2is. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing patterns of SGLT-2is for glucose lowering in T2DM in primary care generally concur with licenced indications according to recommended renal thresholds. A small percentage of people with heart failure were prescribed SGLT-2is for T2DM. An updated analysis is merited should UK National Institute for Health Care and Excellence prescribing guidelines for T2DM be revised to incorporate new data on the benefits for those with reduced renal function or with heart failure.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 13136, 2021 06 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162927

RESUMO

Prescription patterns of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are typically sourced from country-specific data. In this study, a digital pharmacoepidemiological approach was used to investigate APD preferences globally. Publicly available data on worldwide web search intensities in Google for 19 typical and 22 atypical APDs were temporally and spatially normalized and correlated with reported prescription data. The results demonstrated an increasing global preference for atypical over typical APDs since 2007, with quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole showing the largest search intensities in 2020. Cross-sectional analysis of 122 countries in 2020 showed pronounced differences in atypical/typical APD preferences that correlated with gross domestic product per capita. In conclusion, the investigation provides temporal and spatial assessments of global APD preferences and shows a trend towards atypical APDs, although with a relative preference for typical APDs in low-income countries. Similar data-sourcing methodologies allow for prospective studies of other prescription drugs.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/economia , Estudos Transversais , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Saúde Global/economia , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internet
16.
CNS Drugs ; 35(10): 1097-1106, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34164782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The multiple sclerosis (MS) landscape has changed over the past two decades across the world and in the Middle East. The Middle East is an ethnically diverse region located between 12° and 42° of latitude and 35° and 54° of longitude and varying altitudes. The magnitude of the shifts observed in the epidemiology and management of MS differ in each region and from country to country. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide a clinicodemographic overview of the cohorts of patients contributed to MSBase, a large international MS registry, in the Middle East and describe disease-modifying treatment (DMT) utilization in the different countries within the region. Understanding the differences between these cohorts is integral to interpretation of the studies conducted using registry data and provides insight into clinical practice in these cohorts. METHODS: The MSBase registry was searched for patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome from the Middle Eastern countries with data captured between 2009 and 2018. In 2-year epochs, and with special focus on the most recent epoch (2017-2018), we explored the demographic, clinical characteristics and treatment exposures of the studied cohorts and reported the results using standard descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, 13,356 patients from 17 centers in 8 Middle Eastern countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The represented countries were Egypt, Iran, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates. Overall, the represented cohort was young (median 36 years, quartiles 29-45) and captured relatively early after the onset of MS (median disease duration < 10 years, quartiles 3-12). The relapsing-remitting phenotype was the most prevalent phenotype in all countries (73-97%) and the highest proportion of progressive MS was reported in Saudi Arabia (12%). Median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ranged from 0 to 3, depicting a mildly disabled cohort, with the exception of Saudi Arabia where the median EDSS was 4 (quartiles 1.5-6.5). The median relapse frequency was highest in Lebanon (median 1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.16) followed by Egypt (median 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.24) and lowest in Saudi Arabia (median 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.95) and Kuwait (median 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.80). The treatment landscape greatly varied between different countries. Platform injectable therapies were mostly utilized in Egypt, Iran and Turkey (86%, 79% and 53%, respectively), while oral therapies and monoclonal antibodies were more commonly used in Kuwait, Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates (87.2%, 67.3% and 58.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients in the Middle East enrolled in a large multinational registry are representative of the general MS population. The spectrum of therapies used in the individual countries, however, is highly variable. Further studies that include rural and non-academic practices are needed to enhance our understanding of the MS cohorts in the Middle East.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oriente Médio/epidemiologia , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
17.
N Engl J Med ; 384(23): 2219-2228, 2021 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34107181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Documenting current trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control may inform public health policy and planning. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from adults with diabetes in the United States participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to assess national trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control from 1999 through 2018. RESULTS: Diabetes control improved from 1999 to the early 2010s among the participants but subsequently stalled and declined. Between the 2007-2010 period and the 2015-2018 period, the percentage of adult NHANES participants with diabetes in whom glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin level, <7%) was achieved declined from 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9 to 61.8) to 50.5% (95% CI, 45.8 to 55.3). After major improvements in lipid control (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, <130 mg per deciliter) in the early 2000s, minimal improvement was seen from 2007-2010 (52.3%; 95% CI, 49.2 to 55.3) to 2015-2018 (55.7%; 95% CI, 50.8 to 60.5). From 2011-2014 to 2015-2018, the percentage of participants in whom blood-pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) was achieved decreased from 74.2% (95% CI, 70.7 to 77.4) to 70.4% (95% CI, 66.7 to 73.8). The percentage of participants in whom all three targets were simultaneously achieved plateaued after 2010 and was 22.2% (95% CI, 17.9 to 27.3) in 2015-2018. The percentages of participants who used any glucose-lowering medication or any blood-pressure-lowering medication were unchanged after 2010, and the percentage who used statins plateaued after 2014. After 2010, the use of combination therapy declined in participants with uncontrolled blood pressure and plateaued for those with poor glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: After more than a decade of progress from 1999 to the early 2010s, glycemic and blood-pressure control declined in adult NHANES participants with diabetes, while lipid control leveled off. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Peso Corporal , Colesterol/sangue , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada/tendências , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Value Health ; 24(6): 804-811, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, brand-name prescription drugs remain expensive until market exclusivity ends and lower-cost generics become available. Delayed generic drug uptake may increase spending and worsen medication adherence and patient outcomes. We assessed recent trends and factors associated with generic uptake. METHODS: Among 227 drugs facing new generic competition from 2012 to 2017, we used a national claims database to measure generic uptake in the first and second year after generic entry, defined as the proportion of claims for a generic version of the drug. Using linear regression, we evaluated associations between generic uptake and key drug characteristics. RESULTS: Mean generic uptake was 66.1% (standard deviation 22.1%) in the first year and 82.7% (standard deviation 21.6%) in the second year after generic entry. From 2012 to 2017 generic uptake decreased 4.3% per year in the first year (95% confidence interval, 2.8%-5.8%, P < .001) and 3.2%/year in the second year (95% confidence interval, 1.2%-5.1%). Generic uptake was lower for injected than oral drugs in the first year (38.5% vs 70.0%, P < .001) and second year (50.3% vs 86.9%, P < .001). In the second year, generic uptake was higher among drugs with an authorized generic (86.1 vs 80.1%, P = .045) and those with ≥3 generic competitors (87.7% vs 78.6%, P = .055). CONCLUSION: Early generic uptake decreased over the past several years. This trend may adversely affect patients and increase prescription drug spending. Policies are needed to encourage generic competition, particularly among injected drugs administered in a hospital or clinic setting.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Substituição de Medicamentos/tendências , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Substituição de Medicamentos/economia , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Competição Econômica/tendências , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
19.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(13): e021084, 2021 07 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33998258

RESUMO

Background SGLT-2 (sodium glucose transporter-2) inhibitors and GLP-1RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) effectively lowered cardiovascular risk in large clinical trials for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk for these complications, and have been recommended by guidelines. To evaluate the contemporary landscape in which these recommendations would be implemented, we examined the use of these medications according to clinical guideline practice. Methods and Results In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 2017 to 2018, we defined compelling indications for SGLT-2 inhibitors by the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease, and for GLP-1RAs by the presence of established or high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, based on large clinical trials that have been incorporated in guideline recommendations of the American College of Cardiology and American Diabetes Association. We then evaluated use of these medications among patients with physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. All analyses incorporated complex survey design to produce nationally representative estimates. A total 1104 of 9254 sampled individuals had type 2 diabetes mellitus, representing 10.6% (95% CI, 9.7%-11.6%) of the US population or 33.2 million adults nationally. Of these, 52.6% (95% CI, 47.7%-57.5%) had an indication for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 32.8% (95% CI, 28.8%-37.2%) for GLP-1RAs, and 26.6% (95% CI, 22.2%-31.7%) for both medications. During 2017 to 2018, 4.5% (95% CI, 2.4%-8.2%) were treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.7%-3.2%) with GLP-1RAs. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease were not independently associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1RA use in patients with diabetes mellitus. Conclusions Despite a large number of patients being eligible for guideline-recommended cardiorenal protective therapies, there are substantial gaps in the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs, limiting their public health benefits.


Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Definição da Elegibilidade/tendências , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Incretinas/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Glicemia/metabolismo , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Incretinas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
CMAJ Open ; 9(2): E500-E509, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33990364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trends in off-label postpartum use of domperidone and the impact of safety advisories on its use remain unknown. Our objectives were to describe postpartum use of domperidone in Canada, to evaluate the impact of Health Canada advisories on prescribing patterns, and to describe the association between domperidone use and a composite end point of sudden cardiac death or ventricular tachycardia (VT) among postpartum patients. METHODS: We conducted a multidatabase cohort study involving pregnant patients with live births between 2004 and 2017 using administrative health databases from 5 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario). We excluded patients with less than 1 year of prepregnancy database history and with approved indications for domperidone. We assessed domperidone use in the 6 months postpartum and the impact of the 2012 and 2015 Health Canada advisories on prescribing via interrupted time series analysis. We estimated crude rates of VT and sudden cardiac death. RESULTS: We included 1 190 987 live births. Mean maternal age was 28.6 (standard error 0.6) years. Domperidone use increased over time, from 7% in 2003-2005 to 12% in 2009-2011, when it plateaued. The 2012 advisory was followed by a drop in use and a reduction in slope, and the 2015 advisory had a more modest impact. Crude analysis suggests that domperidone may be associated with increased VT or sudden cardiac death (0.74 v. 0.37 per 10 000 person-years; difference per 10 000 person-years: 0.37, 95% confidence interval -0.67 to 1.41). INTERPRETATION: Postpartum domperidone use increased between 2004 and 2017, with prescribing attenuated after Health Canada advisories and a very low absolute rate of VT or sudden cardiac death. These findings suggest that Health Canada advisories affected prescribing; any potential increase in VT or sudden cardiac death with use of domperidone is small and could not be confirmed in this large study STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT04024865.


Assuntos
Morte Súbita Cardíaca , Domperidona/efeitos adversos , Uso de Medicamentos , Transtornos da Lactação/tratamento farmacológico , Uso Off-Label/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Parto , Taquicardia Ventricular , Adulto , Antieméticos/efeitos adversos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Lactação/efeitos dos fármacos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taquicardia Ventricular/induzido quimicamente , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...